Online Content Editor
We are looking for a freelance content writer and editor to work for an established website providing news, reviews and interviews set to style guidelines and policy control.Salary: £150 – £250 per day + on experience. Location: Central London
Lifestyle and Contemporary Factual is one of the BBC?s largest and most successful new media genres, with a portfolio that includes a range of specialist…Location: Greater London
Content Manager – Dutch Speaking
You will analyse customer queries and identify trends. Updating the help pages, monitor customer ratings, reviews and comments.Salary: £38000-43000. Location: South London, West London
Freelance Senior Copywriter
Our client is a multi award winning creative corporate communications company. They are currently looking for a senior copywriter to help work on key projects…Salary: Up to £250 a day. Location: Greater London
Deputy Editor – Financial Corporate
A Deputy Editor required to join the Communications department for a leading financial services establishmentSalary: £40K. Location: Greater London
Editor – B2B
Talented Editor required for established and growing publishing companySalary: £35circ. Location: Greater London
Want to post free content ads and reach a highly targeted audience of content specialists? Send me details of your ad in an email.
Replicating the print magazine online is lazy. But it’s probably got a lot to do with maintaining advertising revenues. ‘Virtual paper’ magazines have been doing the rounds for years and have never really worked.
Publishers don’t really understand how the web works (or rather, how to make money on the web), so try to replicate the offline magazine experience online because print ads are the only approach they understand. It’s just a coincidence that the recipe seems to work for the likes of Monkeymag.co.uk or NatMags’ jellyfishmag.com – they’re essentially offering a print mag which has pages that come alive…and they get to run the same style of print ads.
Then there’s the linear surfing issue. Do users really prefer to be forced to read content in a left to right, magazine page way? This might be handy for older users who are familiar with old media ie print magazines, newspapers, but teens have grown up with content served up in ‘surf in any order’ web pages.
These virtual mags are popular, but they can be read in 10 mins. They don’t offer deep content. Users can get lost in an archive of web pages and read for hours. Search doesn’t seem to lend itself well to virtual magazines, each of which is ringfenced and positioned as a standalone package of content.
I’d love to see the results of any user testing…
Monkeymag, the first major web only launch by a publishing house, now has it’s own MySpace page. And there’s me thinking they took it down.
Take a moment to visit the profile and savour the Monkeymag experience. Alas, no references to dodgy Jordan videos, but piles of other stuff on laydeez nonetheless.
I don’t know if it’s because I’ve been away for a break (hence the lack of new posts), but the latest editions of Monkeymag.co.uk appear to have toned down the more controversial content don’t you think? Are the reported queries by advertisers beginning to take effect?
*As for content updates – business as usual from today*